Found at EuroPravda:
Good job they cleared that one up, eh?
And then this:
In this photo it looks to me as though the 'Baroness' is soliciting with the classic "ten pee for a cuppa tea, guv" approach. However, maybe I am being A - uncharitable and B - ungentlmanly.
Monday, 31 October 2011
English as she is spoke...
Readers might have heard of a classic of unintentional humour, 'English as she is Spoke' - a disastrous Portuguese - English dictionary from 1855. Supposedly the writer had a Portuguese - French dictionary and a French - English dictionary, but no English per se. More of the story can be found here, along with links to vanilla texts. The classic is 'Esperar horas e horas', rendered as 'to craunch the marmoset'. A google translation of the Portuguese give 'expect hours and hours', but the writer has half converted the French phrase, 'croquer le marmot' - an idiom for waiting around.
Anyway, all of this came to mind when looking at a hotel site the other day, which gave out these gems (all very, very sic):
Anyway, all of this came to mind when looking at a hotel site the other day, which gave out these gems (all very, very sic):
"Zakia, our Head Chef initiated her journey in the midst of savours at a tender age surrounded by the soft odours in the kitchen of her mother and her grandmother, large cooks at the La Mamounia".
Coiled up in the deep club armchairs or pt your feet up on the majestic cushions laid on marrow, pleasing settees.
"True echo with the thousand exhaled scents, grabbed with the liking of a dawdling in the varied succession of the universes landscapes".
"In the centre of the corridor hang enormous antique wrought iron lamps suspended by pompous silk strings".
"Lampions in finely engraved and studded border the alleys. The spectacle improvised by the fine north wind, plunges the house in a velvety atmosphere of unfathomed magic, where fairyhood becomes only protagonist of a roundly carried out scenario".
Monday, 24 October 2011
He said what?
This:
Not convinced that is fighting talk? Try rolling it around in your mouth for a bit, and then spit it out at - depending on where you sit in the food chain - an underling or a superior. Or for that greater frisson of danger, a passing Millwall fan.
And if that was not bad enough, a bottle of cava with a bit of an attitude problem:
Not convinced that is fighting talk? Try rolling it around in your mouth for a bit, and then spit it out at - depending on where you sit in the food chain - an underling or a superior. Or for that greater frisson of danger, a passing Millwall fan.
And if that was not bad enough, a bottle of cava with a bit of an attitude problem:
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
Fancy being hectored by the EU?
Well, today is your lucky day. Anyone who can make sense of it is welcome to contribute their thoughts.
I hate to think what versions in other languages might be like.
I hate to think what versions in other languages might be like.
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
The trouble with Scottish independence...
...is that it will make a right mess of rather a lot of flags. My being a unionist is well documented, but rather than dwell on that, I present some aesthetic reasons for maintaining the union, based on my less than l33t skeelz at image manipulation:
So, the Union Flag, in all her glory. Readers might have seen this before.
Something of a design classic, it is generally reckoned. Josh Parsons, in his outstandingly entertaining flag ratings site gives it 70/100 and a B grade, reckoning it a little busy. Do look at his site, but please come back.
What happens if we just remove the blue?
This:
Not great, is it?
If the St Patrick's cross is widened and re-centred we get this:
If anything, even more ghastly.
When that is applied to ourcolonies overseas territories the horrors really begin:
The British Antarctic Territory
Not good. Nor this, Bermuda:
This, by the way, works on the presumption that we English types get to keep those assets during the divorce. If the Scots decided they wanted the Falklands while we got to keep the cat and the furniture, this might be the Falklands' new flag:
Ignoring my technical problems with shades of blue, that's quite nice, isn't it?
There are also problems for our Antipodean friends, which are easily imagined - should they update the Union flag, keep it as is, or add a St Andrews Cross? Vexing problems indeed.
Another possibility is that we do what the Czechs did after the Velvet Divorce and keep the old flag, even though they agreed that they would not... Yet another possibility is that some po faced Edinburgh leftie will campaign for a new flag on the grounds that one with a cross is insufficiently inclusive, does not represent 'the New Scotland', is a colonial relic etc etc, thus sparing us these difficulties.
So, the Union Flag, in all her glory. Readers might have seen this before.
Something of a design classic, it is generally reckoned. Josh Parsons, in his outstandingly entertaining flag ratings site gives it 70/100 and a B grade, reckoning it a little busy. Do look at his site, but please come back.
What happens if we just remove the blue?
This:
Not great, is it?
If the St Patrick's cross is widened and re-centred we get this:
If anything, even more ghastly.
When that is applied to our
The British Antarctic Territory
Not good. Nor this, Bermuda:
This, by the way, works on the presumption that we English types get to keep those assets during the divorce. If the Scots decided they wanted the Falklands while we got to keep the cat and the furniture, this might be the Falklands' new flag:
Ignoring my technical problems with shades of blue, that's quite nice, isn't it?
There are also problems for our Antipodean friends, which are easily imagined - should they update the Union flag, keep it as is, or add a St Andrews Cross? Vexing problems indeed.
Another possibility is that we do what the Czechs did after the Velvet Divorce and keep the old flag, even though they agreed that they would not... Yet another possibility is that some po faced Edinburgh leftie will campaign for a new flag on the grounds that one with a cross is insufficiently inclusive, does not represent 'the New Scotland', is a colonial relic etc etc, thus sparing us these difficulties.
Sunday, 9 October 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)